Two and a Half Men

Two and a Half Men

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Misinterpretation/Miscommunication present in "Interpreter of Maladies", "Hills Like White Elephants", and Medicine

Miscommunication is present in everyday life and is often difficult to circumvent, especially when it revolves around our lives. Theme is extremely imperative in any piece of literature and truly defines the underlying details and meaning of the literary piece. Hills like White Elephants by Ernest Hemingway and Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri both convey superlative illustrations of an evident theme known as miscommunication. Miscommunication throughout these two post-modern stories transmits several different interpretations for the reader to construe and can be seen in the medical field as well.  This recurring theme not only portrays miscommunication, but also illustrates failure to converse, such by the fact that Mr. Das continuously is reading a guidebook and Mrs. Das constantly hiding behind her sunglasses.Miscommunications mentioned by these authors along with medicine are vital to the construction of the stories and plays a paramount role in the execution of the authors’ aim. This theme is also seen in medical practice and Shankur illustrates how it could become a negative consequence as well.
            Interpreter of Maladies focuses on communication as one of the universal themes throughout the story. Lahiri uses the theme of miscommunication to demonstrate various ways of interpreting the underlying details of the characters’ lives. Mr. Kapasi, the interpreter of maladies, has lost the ability to communicate with his wife, leaving him to drink tea alone at night. Due to this fact, the Kapasi’s find themselves in a loveless marriage. The narration depicts that Mr. Kapasi would pick up the newspaper at night, read it, and enjoy tea served by his wife in silence, no communication between the two whatsoever. Moreover, this relationship is also evident in the Das family, in which they are unable to efficiently communicate because of a particular barrier each has which prevents them from any form of contact; Mrs. Das hiding behind her sunglasses and Mr. Das’ constant reading of a guide book. Because of this, their children also behave in the same way and is seen when the children ignore Mr. Kapasi’s warning of the monkeys. Mrs. Das says, “Mr Kapasi, Do something, for God’s sake, do something!” (Lahiri 29). This is a result of the monkeys attacking Mrs. Das’ son, Bobby, because of failure to communicate and truly notify the Das family about the dangers of bringing food around the monkeys. Due to the lack of communication between these families, when one is trying to communicate with another, it ends with someone unintentionally being hurt.
            Hills like White Elephants also centers on communication indifference as a preeminent theme in this short story. Hemingway uses miscommunication to convey several ways of deducing the true meaning of this story. This story illustrates a couple at a crisis point in their relationship. They struggle, in public, to communicate their opposing views on the course their relationship should take. Both the man and the woman talk, but neither listens or comprehends the others point of view. It is at this point in the story that the “operation” refers to the woman having an abortion, and the man is continuously trying to convince her to get the procedure done.  The girl is extremely indecisive and the man keeps on telling her that everything will go back to normal if it happens. The man continues to persist, and the woman begs him to stop talking. The man says, “You’ve got to realize, that I don’t want you to do it if you don’t want to.  I’m perfectly willing to go through with it if it means anything to you” (Hemingway 3). This, in a way, is conveying the man’s manipulation toward the girl and how he just wants to make her happy, although she doesn’t seem like she cares too much and isn’t involved as much as he is. It is assumed by now that the man does actually want her to have the abortion, but without saying it. The girl does want the baby and the man wants the abortion, but the man just wants her to feel a sense of contentment. It takes the girl the entire story to say to the man to please stop talking, instead of communicating normally, and not going back and forth with unimportant context such as, “But I don’t want you to do it if you don’t really want to” (Hemingway 2). Due to this communication deficiency, both the man and the woman are unsure of their decision along with the impact of the outcome. Hemingway leaves the story open for interpretation and a cliffhanger when the couple is waiting at the train station and the woman says, “I’m fine.”
            Aside from miscommunication in literature, this common theme is also present in everyday life and a prime example of this is in medicine. Nirupama Shankar argues that miscommunication is a problem in today’s medical field, and is growing increasingly worse. Miscommunication is the failure to convey pertinent medical information to key members in the medical team; resulting in minor to major errors or even malpractice. In addition, it is very common for several doctors to miscommunicate, thus leading to the patient being sent to numerous different specialists. Generally, patients are referred to many, many, specialists before a diagnosis is made, or even a solution is presented.  All the patient is trying to do is to get the best possible opinion but, during that time of “doctor shopping”, one doctor is unaware that another doctor is even treating the patient, a result of miscommunication (Shankar 1). On a more severe note, when a doctor is prescribing medicine to the patient, it is also possible that the patient will take too much of a dose, ultimately resulting in severe consequences including nausea, vomiting, bloody stools, shallow breathing, or even a coma depending on the medication being taken. The specialist should always make complete sure that he/she is delivering the proper dose to the patient to ensure an apposite recovery.

            In summation, through the use of theme by Ernest Hemingway’s Hills like White Elephants, Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies, and medical miscommunication, these authors, along with doctors, are able to emphasize the significance of the way we interpret a given context. The Das family is at fault for misinterpreting each other due to the lack of communication between them. If they actually conversed with each other, they would realize the importance of Mr. Kapasi’s words when he warned them about bringing food around the monkeys, which ultimately led to their child Bobby becoming ravaged by the monkeys. Furthermore, instead of straightforward answers between the man and the girl in Hills like White Elephants, the two decide to speak indirectly about the abortion and never seem to come to a true conclusion, only with the inference from the reader. Aside from literature, medical miscommunication is seen by the result of doctors sending their patients to multiple specialists before coming to a conclusion, and the doctors doing this unknowingly. Failure to assign the patients the proper doses of medication is also prevalent as means of miscommunication. The theme of miscommunication is an intriguing one, and can be interpreted in various different ways, but simultaneously can be ineffective and deterring to oneself. All of the examples mentioned above ultimately depict how miscommunication can result in negative experiences. 

No comments:

Post a Comment